8 minutes
ECOM6008 Planning and Managing Inventories
Demand Forecasting
Overview
- problems
- long lead times
- unreliable supply processes
- high demand variability
- a large number of SKU's
- where do we hold inventory
- suppliers and manufacturers
- warehouses and distribution centers
- retailers
- types of inventory
- raw materials
- work in process (WIP)
- finished goods
Handling inventory
- reasons
- economies of scale
- encourage firms to transport large quantities of items, and therefore hold large inventories
- unexpected changes in customer demand
- the short life cycle of an increasing number of products – historical data is unavailable
- the presence of many competing products in the marketplace – group vs. single
- delivery lead time
- significant uncertainty quantity / quality
- supply, supplier costs, and delivery times
- economies of scale
- coordination
- relationship
- the need for the coordination of inventory decisions & transportation policies
- impact
- each types of inventory needs its own inventory control mechanism; interactions of the various levels in the supply chain
- relationship
- two important issues
- demand forecasting
- order quantity calculation
- tradeoffs
- inventory cost
- ordering cost (e.g., shipment)
Inventory Management
Inventory policy
- key factors
- customer demand
- pattern or random
- replenishment lead time
- certain or uncertain (lead time: time between placing order and receiving order)
- the number of different products stored at the warehouse
- the length of the planning horizon
- costs
- service level requirement
- customer demand
- cost factors
- order cost
- product cost
- transportation cost
- holding cost (or inventory carrying cost)
- state taxes, property taxes, & insurance on inventories
- maintenance costs
- obsolescence cost
- opportunity costs
- order cost
A single warehouse inventory
- the economic lot size model
- constant demand for a single item
- unlimited capacity of the product supply
- demand is constant at a rate of D items/day
- order quantities are fixed at Q items/order
- a fixed setup cost (K) for each order
- an inventory carrying cost (h) holding cost - for every unit held in inventory per day
- the lead time, the time that elapses between the placement of an order and its receipt, is 0
- initial inventory is 0
- the planning horizon is long (infinite ∞)
- optimal order policy to minimize annual purchasing and carrying costs without shortage
- zero inventory ordering property
- economic order quantity (EOQ)
- total cost (per cycle) = setup cost + holding cost
- setup cost = K
- holding cost = (per unit per time period holding cost) × (average inventory level) × (the length of the cycle) = h × Q/2 × T
- total cost = K + hTQ/2
- average total cost = total cost/T = K/T + hTQ/2T = KD/Q + hQ/2
- total inventory cost is insensitive to order quantity
- changes in order quantities have a relatively small impact on annual setup costs and inventory holding costs
- the effect of demand uncertainty
- fixed order costs
- no fixed order costs
- variable lead times
Managing Uncertainty
The effect of demand uncertainty
- real conditions
- many treat the world as if it were predictable
- production & inventory planning based on forecasts of demand far in advance of the selling season
- companies are aware of demand uncertainty when create a forecast, but design their planning process as if the forecast truly represents reality
- recent technological advances have increased the level of demand uncertainty
- products with short life cycle
- large variety of products compete in market
- many treat the world as if it were predictable
- risk/reward trade-off
- production quantity \(\uparrow\)
- the probability of large losses - risk \(\uparrow\)
- the probability of large gains \(\uparrow\)
- production quantity \(\uparrow\)
- 3 principles of all forecasting techniques
- forecasting is always wrong
- the longer the forecast horizon the worse is the forecast
- aggregate forecasts are more accurate
The multi-period continuous review inventory model
- overview
- normally distributed random demand
- fixed order cost + a cost proportional to amount ordered
- inventory cost - charged per item per unit time
- if an order arrives and there is no inventory, the order is lost
- the distributor has a required service level - the likelihood not stock out during lead time
- inventory level based
- the (s,S) policy or a min max policy
- s as the reorder point
- S as the order-up-to-level
- the reorder point is a function of
- lead time
- average demand
- demand variability
- service level
- notations
- AVG = average daily demand
- STD = standard deviation of daily demand
- L = replenishment lead time from the supplier to the distributor in days
- h = cost of holding one unit of the product for one day at the distributor
- K = fixed cost
- α = service level (probability of stocking out is 1 - α)
- inventory position at any time is the actual inventory plus items already ordered, but not yet delivered
- with fixed order costs
- s = (average inventory during lead time) + (safety stock) = (average daily demand × the lead time) + (safety stock)
- ensures that there will be enough inventory to last until the next order arrives
- the amount of inventory at the warehouse and in the pipeline to protect against deviations from average demand during lead time
- prob{demand during lead time ≥ L × AVG + z × STD × \(\sqrt{L}\)} = 1 − α
- reorder point, s = L × AVG + z × STD × \(\sqrt{L}\)
- order quantity, Q, economic lot size model, Q = \(\sqrt{\frac{2K × AVG}{h}}\)
- order-up-to-level, S, order during the lead time and safety stick, S = Q + s = Q + L × AVG + z × STD × \(\sqrt{L}\)
- s = (average inventory during lead time) + (safety stock) = (average daily demand × the lead time) + (safety stock)
- without fixed order costs
- transportation cost is 0
- s = S = (average inventory during lead time) + (safety stock) = (average daily demand × the lead time) + (safety stock)
- reorder point, s, is identical to the reorder point obtained in the case of “no fixed order cost”, s = L × AVG + z × STD × \(\sqrt{L}\)
- variable lead times
- the lead time is not constant
- normally distributed with average lead time AVGL standard deviation STDL
- AVG × AVGL - average demand during lead time
- the amount of safety stock \(z × \sqrt{AVGL × {STD}^2 + {AVG}^2 + {STDL}^2}\)
- s = AVG × AVGL + \(z × \sqrt{AVGL × {STD}^2 + {AVG}^2 + {STDL}^2}\)
- S = Q + s = Q + AVG × AVGL + \(z × \sqrt{AVGL × {STD}^2 + {AVG}^2 + {STDL}^2}\)
- the (s,S) policy or a min max policy
- time/cycle based
- base-stock level policy
- determine a target inventory level, base-stock level
- each review period, review the inventory position is reviewed and order enough to raise the inventory position to the base-stock level
- r = length of the review period
- L = lead time
- AVG = average daily demand
- STD = standard deviation of this daily demand
- average demand during an interval of r + L days = (r + L) × AVG
- safety stock = z × STD × \(\sqrt{r + L}\)
- base-stock level policy
- service level optimization
- optimal inventory policy assumes a specific service level target
- appropriate level of service?
- may be determined by the downstream customer
- retailer may require the supplier, to maintain a specific service level
- supplier will use that target to manage its own inventory
- facility may have the flexibility to choose the appropriate level of service
- trade-off - retail strategy
- everything else being equal
- service level \(\uparrow\), inventory level \(\uparrow\)
- for the same inventory level, lead time \(\uparrow\) to the facility, level of service provided by the facility \(\downarrow\)
- inventory level \(\downarrow\), the higher the impact of a unit of inventory on service level \(\uparrow\) and hence on expected profit
- given a target service level across all products determine service level for each SKU so as to maximize expected profit
- everything else being equal, service level \(\uparrow\) with
- \(\uparrow\) profit margin
- \(\uparrow\) volume
- \(\downarrow\) variability
- \(\downarrow\) lead time
- everything else being equal
- profit optimization and service level
- target inventory level = 95% across all products
- service level > 99% for many products with high profit margin, high volume and low variability
- service level < 95% for products with low profit margin, low volume and high variability
Managing Inventory in Supply Chain
Risk pooling
- 2 warehouses \(\rightarrow\) 1 warehouse
- increase delivery time (disadvantage)
- either the same service level with much lower inventory or a higher service level with the same amount of total inventory (advantage)
- coefficient of variation
- = standard deviation / co-efficient of variation
- standard deviation measures the absolute variability of customer demands
- co-efficient of variation measures variability relative to average demand
- benefits
- demand variability is reduced
- high demand from one customer will be offset by low demand from another
- allows to reduce safety stock, therefore reduce average inventory for the same service level
- the higher the coefficient of variation, the greater the benefit obtained from centralized systems
- the benefits from risk pooling depend on the behavior of demand from one market relative to demand from another
- one distribution center is better than two centers, two better than three (centralized better than decentralized)
- demand variability is reduced
- reduce systemwide cost
- echelon inventory at any stage or level of the system is the inventory on hand at the echelon, plus all downstream inventory
- individual retailers are managed using the appropriate (s, S) inventory policy
- warehouse policy controls its echelon inventory position by (s, S) inventory policy
- whenever the echelon inventory position for the warehouse is below s, an order is placed to raise its echelon inventory position to S
Supply Contract
Overview
- key insights
- the optimal order quantity is not necessarily equal to average forecast demand
- the optimal quantity depends on the relationship between marginal profit & marginal cost
- as order quantity increases, average profit first increases and then decreases
- as production quantity increases, risk increases; the probability of large gains and of large losses increases
- effective supply contracts allow supply chain partners to replace sequential optimization by global optimization
- buy back and revenue sharing contracts achieve this objective through risk sharing
- contracts
- sequential
- buy back
- revenue sharing
- quantity flexibility contracts
- supplier provides full refund for returned items as long as the number of returns is no larger than a certain quantity
- sales rebate contracts
- supplier provides direct incentive for the retailer to increase sales by means of a rebate paid by the supplier for any item sold above a certain quantity
ecom6008 supply chain and e-logistics management planning inventories managing inventories
1634 Words
2021-06-02 15:28